Did you hear the one about the buffalo?

Bison by seanabrady“Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.”

What? You didn’t get that? It’s a perfectly good sentence.

For those of you who don’t know, “buffalo” is a very versatile word. It can be a singular or plural noun (meaning any of various wild oxen, including the American bison), a proper noun (a city in western New York), or a verb (meaning to bully, baffle, or bewilder).

Basically, the sentence above describes the pecking order of buffalo in the city of Buffalo. It’s a bit easier to understand when we substitute alternate words for “buffalo”:

Buffalo bison [that] Buffalo bison bully[,] bully Buffalo bison.

(Really, it’s grammatically correct.)

And if that’s not enough for you, here’s a similar sentence starring my favorite animal: “Dogs dogs dog dog dogs.”

Know of any others? Do share!

Special thanks to my brother-in-law-to-be, lover of all things peculiar, for bringing this grammatical monstrosity to my attention.

4 Responses to “Did you hear the one about the buffalo?”

  1. February 27th, 2010 | 12:49 am

    Is it too late or am I just dense? I don’t quite get how to read the sentences!

  2. March 2nd, 2010 | 9:52 pm

    You’re not dense! It took me a long time to figure it out myself. You have to insert “that” the first few times you read it to get the syntax. Try this: “Dogs [that] dogs dog, dog [other] dogs.” Hopefully that helps (?) …

  3. Dad
    March 17th, 2010 | 10:14 pm

    An Alsatian went to a telegram office, took out a blank form and wrote, “Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof.”

    The clerk examined the paper and politely told the dog: “There are only nine words here. You could send another ‘Woof’ for the same price.”

    “But,” the dog replied, “that would make no sense at all.”

  4. March 18th, 2010 | 2:41 pm

    LOL. Love it, Dad! :)

Leave a reply